[Interest] QCommandLine parser: why can't value() return positional arguments?
Thiago Macieira
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Sun Feb 1 00:08:20 CET 2015
On Saturday 31 January 2015 20:55:45 Jason H wrote:
> Couldn't it be more though? I don't see why if you do use
> addPositionalArgument, that it couldn't provide the mapping of name to
> position.
By definition of "positional argument", you access it by position. If you
accessed it by name, it wouldn't be called "positional".
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Interest
mailing list