[Interest] QCommandLine parser: why can't value() return positional arguments?

[Thiago Macieira]

On Saturday 31 January 2015 20:55:45 Jason H wrote:
> Couldn't it be more though? I don't see why if you do use
> addPositionalArgument, that it couldn't provide the mapping of name to
> position.

By definition of "positional argument", you access it by position. If you 
accessed it by name, it wouldn't be called "positional".

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center