[Interest] Q_OS_ANDROID macro
Nuno Santos
nunosantos at imaginando.pt
Wed Feb 4 11:50:10 CET 2015
My real problem is with the slot parameter type that will not exist in Android.
> On 04 Feb 2015, at 10:37, Reinhardt Behm <rbehm at hushmail.com> wrote:
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> Reinhardt Behm
>
> mailto: rbehm at hushmail.com
> Skype: reinhardt.behm
>
> A different header file is possible but a bit messy solution.
> You can use the macro in the .cpp to create one real slot function and one for
> android which is just an empty dummy.
>
> Moc does not care what you do in your .cpp file.
>
> --
> Reinhardt
>
> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 10:21:02 Nuno Santos wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> How can I workaround this situation? Create a specific source file for
>> Android?
>>
>> Any other ideas?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nuno
>>
>>> On 04 Feb 2015, at 10:18, Reinhardt Behm <rbehm at hushmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 10:05:12 Nuno Santos wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have been faced with an awkward situation when building an app for
>>>> android:
>>>>
>>>> My app uses Bonjour but that is not available on Android, so basically
>>>> for
>>>> android I don’t want to include some slots in a particular class:
>>>>
>>>> #ifndef Q_OS_ANDROID
>>>> void recordAdded(const BonjourRecord &record);
>>>> void recordRemoved(const BonjourRecord &record);
>>>> void bonjourRecordResolved(const QHostInfo &hostInfo, int port);
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> When compiling for Android, moc file as complaining about not having the
>>>> implementation of the methods above which means that the preprocessor has
>>>> passed over Q_OS_ANDROID, however, QtCreator had that area greyed out.
>>>>
>>>> Is Q_OS_ANDROID available at the time the header file is processed for
>>>> moc
>>>> generation? to avoid this situation?
>>>
>>> MOC does not understand and therefor does not respect macros and #ifdef.
>
More information about the Interest
mailing list