[Interest] qtchooser and the current importance/interest of QTDIR?
René J.V. Bertin
rjvbertin at gmail.com
Wed Feb 18 22:40:52 CET 2015
On Wednesday February 18 2015 08:16:11 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> As for cmake, the answer is simple: they contain hardcoded absolute paths to
> the Qt tools inside the Qt prefix. Those tools are expected to remain where
> they are and not get renamed. They don't need the "-qt5" argument because
> cmake isn't calling qtchooser, it's calling the tool directly.
>
> For example:
>
> /usr/bin/moc -> qtchooser
> /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/moc actual tool
>
> The cmake file points to the latter and cmake never runs the former.
So that confirms what I thought: those files are modified (or created) so that they contain the correct paths, no need for special action as long as cmake can find them. Good, exactly what I was hoping to read.
Thanks,
René
More information about the Interest
mailing list