[Interest] Qt 5.3 vs Qt 5.4 (etc)

[Allan Sandfeld Jensen]

On Saturday 10 January 2015, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Saturday January 10 2015 11:44:37 Tomasz Olszak wrote:
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> >And here is interesting article about it:
> >https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++
> 
> Yes, I knew that one, and that it mentions binary compatibility between
> "even bigger releases" of Qt. Still, to hang ABI compatibility only on the
> use of d pointers, that's a real leap of faith without a bit of
> confirmation (and you even have the perfect name for that ;) )
> 
D pointers are designed to preserve ABI, that is hardly a leap of faith.

` Allan