[Interest] Qt 5.3 vs Qt 5.4 (etc)

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

On Tuesday 20 January 2015 08:15:53 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2015 10:25:04 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer 
wrote:
> > If the library is part of Qt itself then it will certainly not hurt, but
> > nowadays we need to push all Qt submodules at the same time because there
> > are  runtime checks in order. Ie, I can't just package qtbase 5.3.2 and
> > push it alone waiting for another submodule like, let's say, qtsvg 5.3.1
> > to
> > continue working. This is enforced by Qt itself at runtime.
> > 
> > But then again, I need to understand it's purpose right first I guess
> 
> Right, this would be a run-time enforcement of the same exact version.

Then it shouldn't be a problem (understanding a lib part of Qt, as you only 
replied to that part).

-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20150120/e62817e7/attachment.sig>