[Interest] Qt 5.3 vs Qt 5.4 (etc)
Thiago Macieira
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue Jan 20 17:15:53 CET 2015
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 10:25:04 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> If the library is part of Qt itself then it will certainly not hurt, but
> nowadays we need to push all Qt submodules at the same time because there
> are runtime checks in order. Ie, I can't just package qtbase 5.3.2 and
> push it alone waiting for another submodule like, let's say, qtsvg 5.3.1 to
> continue working. This is enforced by Qt itself at runtime.
>
> But then again, I need to understand it's purpose right first I guess
Right, this would be a run-time enforcement of the same exact version.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Interest
mailing list