[Interest] Indie Mobil Program terminated?

Attila Csipa qt at csipa.in.rs
Thu Jul 2 23:46:38 CEST 2015

On 7/2/2015 4:42 PM, Igor Mironchik wrote:
> Ok, Xamarin is cheaper than Qt. But with Xamarin and C# you can write 
> crosspaltform only business logic. All UI is platform dependend and 
> you should write UI for iOS, UI for Android, and so on. With Qt you 
> can write once and deploy everywhere...

I would rather say that while Xamarin tries to be more like a C# binding 
for the platforms, whereas Qt tries to abstract away native APIs via Qt 
APIs. In my experience, Qt UIs are not that portable either, the 
advantage rather being in the number of supported platforms, the cleaner 
QML syntax, better performance and (L)GPL availability. Xamarin's 
advantage is that you have all the APIs available to you essentially 
from day 1 of any SDK release (!), you don't need to wait for the next 
(couple of) Qt releases for a back-end to appear.

Best regards,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20150702/a6af2742/attachment.html>

More information about the Interest mailing list