[Interest] Indie Mobil Program terminated?

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Sun Jul 5 19:42:57 CEST 2015

On Sunday 05 July 2015 14:05:46 Kate Alhola wrote:
> > On 05 Jul 2015, at 09:05, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> 
> >> On Saturday 04 July 2015 21:36:29 Kate Alhola wrote:
> >> But i proposed alternative that does not cost anything but may bring a
> >> lot
> >> of profits later.
> > 
> > I think you're wrong. There's a cost associated with the program, at least
> > to keep the website running, with the online store and registration, and
> > someone to look over the activity. The cost is not zero.
> I know, selling Indie developer licence has costs but for that reason I
> proposed just amendment tom LGPL that allows use of Qt in certain mobile
> closed source apps when monthly revenue is under 10000€. There is no need
> any extra work compared to LGPL. If someone wants violate licence, they can
> do it with LGPL. There is no more need for looking over than in LGPL cases.

You're basically saying that we should add yet another licence to Qt's current 
tri-licensing scheme:

	* LGPLv2.1
	* GPLv3
	* Commercial/Enterprise
	* Indie Mobile

Is that it?
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

More information about the Interest mailing list