[Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

Reinhardt Behm rbehm at hushmail.com
Tue Apr 5 14:47:05 CEST 2016


On Monday 04 April 2016 16:50:12 Emre Besirik wrote:
> > On 04 Apr 2016, at 15:41, Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru> wrote:
> >> Well there must be something can be done, Qt Can use Intellij like google
> >> did, I know its a little bit more work compared to CLion fork but it is
> >> possible.> 
> > A liitle bit?
> > 
> > That would mean porting of all clang code model code (and maybe other
> > parts) into different IDE architecture and integrating all C++ code with
> > Java. And it still would be the same clang code model that you don't
> > like.
> Ok but jetbrains did it, why cant we?
> 
> >> Or at least a plugin for intellij platform maybe? I mean as long as you
> >> want to be part of the solution...> 
> > Well, if CLion gets bigger market share than Visual Studio it might happen
> > that VS plugin is dropped in favour of this IDE.
> We all know thats not going to happen, why not to have plugins for 2
> different IDEs?

What is stops you from doing it? 
It is all open source and many people are quite happy with QtCreator. If you 
want it changed do it, or find somebody who will do it and finance it.

-- 
Reinhardt





More information about the Interest mailing list