[Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

Emre Besirik nomercy at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 20:50:22 CEST 2016

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 20:15, Prav <pr12og2 at programist.ru> wrote:
> Emre Besirik, could you please change the style you discuss things here?

Can you please be a little more specific? I don’t remember insulting anyone or anything like that?

>> That I can agree with! Thank you for your more cunstructive
>> comments on the issue
> OK ... so why you not start make your messages constructive. Like with the list of filled feature-requests

Thats not so easy for my part because I think whats lacking is a complete makeover… I only maybe file a bug report saying that “A expert team of UI/UX specialists should go through all of QtC” how is that for a bug report? thats why I’m here… Everybody here basicly asking for directions on how to imrpove things but the thing is non of us are UI/UX experts here and everybody will say something different here about how they like things but as probably everyone also will agree here that not a sigle UI/UX expert tocuhed QtC ever before, its all became this by simply how QtC devs wanted/liked for them selves up to this point… And thats actually the one thats need to chage first. We need at least one UI/UX expert to work on QtC to shape things as user friendly as possible...

>> I’m craving for the joy I get when I code Java in Intellij while coding in QtC.
> I believe nobody in Qt Company or Qt community is against joy of using QtC.
> To make joy closer give us numbers of your feature-requests or bug-reports at https://bugreports.qt.io/

see prev. comment

>> Why do some of you guys keep accusing people for trolling? Why do
>> you deny improvement?
> Who is against improvements? Nobody.
> You want others to improve QtC? Fill bug-reports and feature-request.
> Everything else is unconstructive.

This is wrong as explained before bug-reports won’t cut it. We need more fundamental changes...

>> You don’t add any value
>> to this thread, only baseless acusations.
> OK ... show yours help to QtC ... for example results of using bugreports.qt.io

This is me trying to help by trying to  convince people to have a UI/UX expert on QtC.

> May be everybody in this thread better do use bugreports.qt.io first before sending here its
> negative opinion?

You are fixated on bug reports, bug reports won’t help current stuation here. Thats for bugs and some very particular feature requests. in my opinion what needs to be chaged is more fundamental, a complete makeover to match current IDE standarts.

Emre Beşirik
nomercy at gmail.com

More information about the Interest mailing list