[Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

[Emre Besirik]

> On 06 Apr 2016, at 10:45, André Somers <andre at familiesomers.nl> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Op 05/04/2016 om 21:09 schreef Emre Besirik:
>> 
>>> On 05 Apr 2016, at 22:03, Jean-Michaël Celerier <jeanmichael.celerier at gmail.com <mailto:jeanmichael.celerier at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Emre Besirik < <mailto:nomercy at gmail.com>nomercy at gmail.com <mailto:nomercy at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> a complete makeover to match current IDE standarts
>>> 
>>> Example of code coloration for some code of mine in QtCreator : 
>>> <qtc.png>
>>> ​
>>> 
>>> And in CLion : 
>>> <clion.png>
>>> ​
>>> Of course, nothing auto-completes in CLion...
>> 
>> 
>> CLion doesn’t officially support Qt yet? besides I’m not just talking about code coloring?
> Isn't code coloring part of that UX you seem to be all about then? I find proper coloring of my code to be very helpful while coding, it certainly adds to my User eXperience. 
> 
> Indeed a report saying "QtC needs a team of UX experts to go over it and do a complete revamp" is not going to do much. The video you pointed out helps a bit (did not watch it yet, put it on my list though). Why would you claim that QtC is basically beyond fixing? And please be specific in what you are looking for. Statements that it is "not modern" or the likes don't help developers and designers to identify the problem areas which perhaps are very real. Perhaps you could even record a few screen sessions demonstrating aspects of the UI of CLion that you find particulary better than what's available in QtCreator, and share those?
> 

Ok I’ll try to do better but indeed the video I’ve sent before does really explain things a lot better than I ever could.

Regards,
Emre Beşirik
nomercy at gmail.com



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20160406/20e59d4c/attachment.html>