[Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

Emre Besirik nomercy at gmail.com
Wed Apr 6 11:27:16 CEST 2016


> On 06 Apr 2016, at 12:18, André Somers <andre at familiesomers.nl> wrote:
>> 
>> What I’m trying to say is; non of us here are a UI/UX expert, right?
> 
> I would not make such assumptions out of hand... Do you know who is subscribed here, and who is working on QtC?

Well yes I can not know for sure but I’m betting on it. if I’m wrong then I’ll apologise about this...

> 
>> so whatever we add as feature requests to the bug report system will only maybe add some new functionality but will not improve User Experience, am I correct?
> 
> Wrong. The UX of an application is defined by its design and its features, and how the these interact. So, indicating where there are issues with these so they can be addressed will help the UX. UX is not some secret sause to be poured over an application when the coding is done (or something you can only work on before you start coding). 

Please see my reply to Jean-Michaël Celerier on this subject.

> 
>> QtC simply needs help from an expert on the subject...
> That is the kind of useless statement people here become annoyed about. Point out the problems before you start assuming that outside help is needed to address these as of yet unknown problems.

Again my reply to Jean-Michaël Celerier


Regards,
Emre Beşirik
nomercy at gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20160406/9f6af629/attachment.html>


More information about the Interest mailing list