[Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

[Shantanu Tushar]

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:08 PM, NoMercy <nomercy at gmail.com> wrote:

> I totally disagree with you here, JB products are way faster in code
> completion for instance and WAAAAY smarter...
>

He was talking about load times and stuff. I've used a couple of JetBrains
products at work (PyCharm, Rubymine) and they are damn slow (compared to
native IDEs like Creator or VS) to load and eat memory like I eat cakes.
You're right when you say that JetBrains products are way smarter (after
all, thats what their whole business model is about), but Nuno is right
about the load times.


> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Nuno Santos <nunosantos at imaginando.pt>
> wrote:
>
>> On 05 Apr 2016, at 14:19, NoMercy <nomercy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> people are practically begging jetbrains to save themselves from
>> QtCreator (no offense intended but this is the case for many people)
>>
>>
>> Sorry to interfere here but I couldn’t read this without sharing my
>> thoughts. Qt Creator is simply the most straightforward IDE around.
>>
>> All IDE based in Java simply suck because they are all slow like a
>> turtle. I personally hate any kind of Java based software because of the
>> performance impact.
>>
>> It is also a paradox a JET brain software using Java to support it. A JET
>> brain cannot wait for Java to render. :)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Interest mailing list
>> Interest at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
>


-- 
Shantanu Tushar    (UTC +0530)
shantanu.io
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20160407/b59ee992/attachment.html>