[Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

NoMercy nomercy at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 15:38:49 CEST 2016

I totally disagree with you here, JB products are way faster in code
completion for instance and WAAAAY smarter...

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Nuno Santos <nunosantos at imaginando.pt>

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 14:19, NoMercy <nomercy at gmail.com> wrote:
> people are practically begging jetbrains to save themselves from QtCreator
> (no offense intended but this is the case for many people)
> Sorry to interfere here but I couldn’t read this without sharing my
> thoughts. Qt Creator is simply the most straightforward IDE around.
> All IDE based in Java simply suck because they are all slow like a turtle.
> I personally hate any kind of Java based software because of the
> performance impact.
> It is also a paradox a JET brain software using Java to support it. A JET
> brain cannot wait for Java to render. :)
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20160405/d76d7239/attachment.html>

More information about the Interest mailing list