[Interest] Qt component repositories

Jaroslaw Staniek staniek at kde.org
Wed Jan 27 00:32:57 CET 2016


On 26 January 2016 at 22:16, Jason H <jhihn at gmx.com> wrote:

> > The most helpful initiatives for Qt is the one that de-fragments it. Qt
> community isn't big enough to cut it into pieces...
>
>
> I completely agree. We are too small to be fragmented. We should resolve
> this sooner than later. I also like the idea that it gets carried forth by
> an organization - as part of the project a first-class binary like qmake.
>
>
Thanks Jason.
PS: It's not that Cutehacks​ do not get credit where credit is due. Let me
just mention it already gets credit for awesome evangelism/popularization
of Qt technologies especially with Qt Quick. Just like KDAB for
evangelism/education/extra useful tools/co-creation of the whole niche. And
ICS. Just like Kitware for CMake.

(OK here's some fragmentation in the buildsystems space if someone counts
qbs in the game too but before qbs, CMake/QMake addressed quite distinct
use cases and complemented each other)

And I can't forget to say thank you for all code contributions and
co-maintainership.
It's all so much based on a common sense, no reason for not cooperating.
​​

-- 
regards, Jaroslaw Staniek

KDE:
: A world-wide network of software engineers, artists, writers, translators
: and facilitators committed to Free Software development - http://kde.org
Calligra Suite:
: A graphic art and office suite - http://calligra.org
Kexi:
: A visual database apps builder - http://calligra.org/kexi
Qt Certified Specialist:
: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20160127/2f3d847a/attachment.html>


More information about the Interest mailing list