[Interest] Qt 5.6LTS vs 5.7+

Sze Howe Koh szehowe.koh at gmail.com
Mon Sep 5 01:22:57 CEST 2016


On 5 September 2016 at 02:13, Roland Hughes <roland at logikalsolutions.com> wrote:
> I just ran a simple QML project test on the Raspberry Pi:
> http://www.logikalsolutions.com/wordpress/information-technology/raspberry-qt-part-12-qml-blows-big-stinky-chunks/
> Yimminy is it a resource pig.

Would you be willing to re-run your test using Qt Quick Controls 2?

You can find relevant benchmarks for Raspberry Pi B+ at
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/03/31/qt-quick-controls-for-embedded/

See also http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/06/16/qt-5-7-released/ -- "Qt
Quick Controls 1 were targeted at the desktop, and came with all the
bells and whistles required for desktop applications. This implied an
overhead that often made them too slow for usage on embedded devices.
Qt Quick Controls 2 solve these issues." The resource hog was not so
much JavaScript as the graphics stack.


Regards,
Sze-Howe



More information about the Interest mailing list