[Interest] What you don't like about Qt

Konstantin Tokarev annulen at yandex.ru
Fri Sep 23 21:34:02 CEST 2016



23.09.2016, 22:17, "Jason H" <jhihn at gmx.com>:
>
> Even the old Qt UI files were somewhat declarative, with signal/slot mappings included in the UI file.

This sounds like you are not sure what word "declarative" means. Of course, UI file is 100% declarative, irrespectively from if signal/slot mappings are included or not. At the same time QML file may be not fully declarative, as it can contain imperative JS code.

>
> Here's a tongue in cheek but very informative talk about it: (30min)
> https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/the-birth-and-death-of-javascript
>
> Because QML has rough edges and isn't 100% C++, that's more of an implementation detail, one that can be addressed without throwing the baby out with the bath water. I'm still a fan of Elegant Architecture and MVC and all that, and it still can all be done in QML. It's just that it's easier than ever.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin



More information about the Interest mailing list