[Interest] Getting a QImage from an QML Image, protocol, agnostic QImage?

[Roland Hughes]

Fine.

You have the right to ACCESS but not COPY which is what someone told you 
to do with network manager. Copying images you do not own is a crime.

Wasn't trolling, just trying to keep you out of prison. Most every 
content publishing company on the Internet has started pursuing these 
cases adding tracking info to their content which can be found by Google 
Alerts. But hey, enjoy the communal showers!



On 04/12/2017 09:57 AM, Jason H wrote:
> Please stop trolling my thread.
> 1. You don't know what images my app will be accessing, or my rights 
> and permissions to them
> 2. The fact that an image is posted openly it prima facia evidence 
> that I have permission to access it, given there are access control 
> measures i.e. HTTP 4xx codes, robots.txt
> 3. Finally, I have not requested or retained anyone for legal services.
> So please refrain from further legal discussion on my thread.
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 10:37 AM
> *From:* "Roland Hughes" <roland at logikalsolutions.com>
> *To:* "Jean-Michaël Celerier" <jeanmichael.celerier at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* interest <interest at qt-project.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Interest] Getting a QImage from an QML Image, 
> protocol, agnostic QImage?
>
> The fundamental principal behind copyright law will never change.
>
> The moment a work of any kind is created the creator holds the 
> copyright. Only the holder of the copyright can grant use of the work. 
> Only the media and length of copyright changes. Currently, in America 
> that is life of creator + 70 years for works published after 1978.
>
> On 04/12/2017 08:41 AM, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote:
>
>     On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Roland Hughes
>     <roland at logikalsolutions.com <mailto:roland at logikalsolutions.com>>
>     wrote:
>
>         Google wantonly engages in the world's largest copyright
>         infringement enterprise on the planet.
>
>     Copyright law was different one hundred years ago and will be
>     different one hundred years ago from now. Usages changes, and law
>     changes (generally way too late, but still) according to these usages.
>
> -- 
> Roland Hughes, President
> Logikal Solutions
> (630)-205-1593
>
> http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
> http://www.infiniteexposure.net
> http://www.johnsmith-book.com
> http://www.logikalblog.com
> http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
> http://lesedi.us/
> _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list 
> Interest at qt-project.org 
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

-- 
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
http://lesedi.us/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20170412/a48518bc/attachment.html>