[Interest] Getting a QImage from an QML Image, protocol, , agnostic QImage?

Roland Hughes roland at logikalsolutions.com
Sun Apr 16 16:47:35 CEST 2017


Just because you choose not to believe it does not make it FUD.

$8K penalty for one image

http://www.contentfac.com/copyright-infringement-penalties-are-scary/

http://www.bicklaw.com/Publications/InternetCopyrightInfringement.htm

http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1320&context=wmborj

increasing criminal prosecution

https://www.out-law.com/page-12145

There are now even copyright prosecution services in the UK

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/h_to_k/intellectual_property_crime/

You can't even hide in Korea anymore

https://askkorealaw.com/2008/12/29/two-internet-portal-giants-prosecuted-for-aiding-copyright-infringement/



On 04/16/2017 09:35 AM, Ch'Gans wrote:
> Stop spreading FUD!
>
> We don't need your biased opinion on the matter, go home and take your pills!
>
> Chris

-- 
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
http://lesedi.us/




More information about the Interest mailing list