[Interest] Getting a QImage from an QML Image, protocol, , agnostic QImage?
Roland Hughes
roland at logikalsolutions.com
Sun Apr 16 16:47:35 CEST 2017
Just because you choose not to believe it does not make it FUD.
$8K penalty for one image
http://www.contentfac.com/copyright-infringement-penalties-are-scary/
http://www.bicklaw.com/Publications/InternetCopyrightInfringement.htm
http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1320&context=wmborj
increasing criminal prosecution
https://www.out-law.com/page-12145
There are now even copyright prosecution services in the UK
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/h_to_k/intellectual_property_crime/
You can't even hide in Korea anymore
https://askkorealaw.com/2008/12/29/two-internet-portal-giants-prosecuted-for-aiding-copyright-infringement/
On 04/16/2017 09:35 AM, Ch'Gans wrote:
> Stop spreading FUD!
>
> We don't need your biased opinion on the matter, go home and take your pills!
>
> Chris
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
http://lesedi.us/
More information about the Interest
mailing list