[Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 68, Issue 13

[Konstantin Tokarev]

20.05.2017, 10:01, "André Pönitz" <apoenitz at t-online.de>:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 05:17:22PM -0500, Roland Hughes wrote:
>>  On 05/18/2017 08:31 AM, Kevin Funk wrote:
>>  >Citing you from the thread:
>>  >>...
>>  >>No, KDevelop does things completely different from Qt so not an
>>  >>option...
>>  >>...
>>  >KDevelop is an IDE, Qt is an application development framework. So in fact
>>  >your relation cannot make sense to begin with.
>>  Qt is an application framework with a design and build philosophy of .pro,
>>  qmake and moc
>
> I would neither call part of a 'philosophy' around Qt, that'd be
> probably something with 'cross platform', 'ease of use'.
>
> Moc is there because it provides functionality that is not easily
> available in C++, qmake/.pro is the build system that happens to be used
> for Qt itself currently. While moc is kind of mandatory to use for Qt
> application development for technical reasons,

But there is https://woboq.com/blog/verdigris-qt-without-moc.html

> qmake is not, and it is
> completely reasonable for an IDE to support, or even to focus on, other
> build systems.
>
> Andre'
>
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin