[Interest] Standardizing Qt Kit Names

[David M. Cotter]

+1

> On Aug 29, 2018, at 10:31 AM, Artem Sidyakin <artem.sidyakin at qt.io> wrote:
> 
> As a perfectionist with OCD myself :) I find this point to be more than minor as it has been bothering me for quite a some time now.
> 
> ---
> Artem Sidyakin
> 
>> On 29 Aug 2018, at 09:27, Jason H <jhihn at gmx.com> wrote:
>> 
>> It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more uniform kit name structure.
>> 
>> I'd like it to be Qt / Version / Platform like
>> Qt 5.10.1 for Desktop
>> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS
>> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS Simulator
>> 
>> Instead I currently see:
>> Android  for armabi-v7a (GC... Qt5.10.1..)
>> Desktop Qt 5.10.1 clang ...
>> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS
>> 
>> Either iOS has to come first, or Android, Desktop, have to come last. I think for readability (and sorting) it should be 
>> <Qt version> / <Platform> / <Sub platform>
>> 
>> Where subplatform is Simulator, or CPU architecture This way, all Qt platforms of the same version would be grouped together. Since I regard (and I think others) Qt version as the first logical grouping rather than platform (who wants to select Platform, then Qt Version?, maybe if enough people want it, make it dynamic?)