[Interest] Standardizing Qt Kit Names

[Artem Sidyakin]

As a perfectionist with OCD myself :) I find this point to be more than minor as it has been bothering me for quite a some time now.

---
Artem Sidyakin

> On 29 Aug 2018, at 09:27, Jason H <jhihn at gmx.com> wrote:
> 
> It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more uniform kit name structure.
> 
> I'd like it to be Qt / Version / Platform like
> Qt 5.10.1 for Desktop
> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS
> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS Simulator
> 
> Instead I currently see:
> Android  for armabi-v7a (GC... Qt5.10.1..)
> Desktop Qt 5.10.1 clang ...
> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS
> 
> Either iOS has to come first, or Android, Desktop, have to come last. I think for readability (and sorting) it should be 
> <Qt version> / <Platform> / <Sub platform>
> 
> Where subplatform is Simulator, or CPU architecture This way, all Qt platforms of the same version would be grouped together. Since I regard (and I think others) Qt version as the first logical grouping rather than platform (who wants to select Platform, then Qt Version?, maybe if enough people want it, make it dynamic?)
> 
> Just my quantitative eased $.02<Screen Shot 2018-08-24 at 10.33.50 AM.png><Screen Shot 2018-08-29 at 12.11.49 PM.png>_______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest