[Interest] Standardizing Qt Kit Names

[André Pönitz]

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:52:07AM +0300, coroberti . wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Tomasz Siekierda <sierdzio at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pönitz <apoenitz at t-online.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote:
> >> > It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more uniform kit name structure.
> >>
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I'd also suggest keeping these names as consise as possible. For
> > example, I don't see a need to keep "Qt" in kit name... I know it is
> > Qt, no need to mention that. So "5.10.1 Desktop MinGW" should be
> > enough.
> 
> Jason, it's a very good idea.
> Tomacz, this is a helpful as well.
> 
> +2
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Robert


Cool. There's a +2 already.

Now I apparently just missed the link to the patch on gerrit.

Andre'