[Interest] Qt Quick Controls 1 deprecated but no native styles for Qt Quick Controls 2?

[Jean-Michaël Celerier]

> Might be the case but then who said the software emulation in question
cannot be based on QPainter? We have QQuickPaintedItem, for instance.

I'd like to see it before I believe it - for instance I know that at least
on my software, using a QOpenGLViewport-backed QGraphicsView is quite
slower and more laggy than a CPU-rendered one, consistently, on macOS,
windows  and linux (and I have a fairly good GPU).

  >  Qt Quick Controls have no animations by default

but QQC 1 is deprecated.
And QQC 2 has animations by default - I invite you to go to QtCreator and
press File / New project  / Qt application  / Qt Quick Application - Swipe
and interact with it.

> just because of a small number of corner cases.

these really aren't that small in my experience. Also, no tree view -> no
go for a *lot* of technical apps.


On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:06 PM Dimitar Dobrev <dpldobrev at protonmail.com>
wrote:

> On 10.12.18 20:58, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote:
>
> > In my experience QPainter is quite faster than LLVMPipe or other
> > openGL software rendering solutions.
> Might be the case but then who said the software emulation in question
> cannot be based on QPainter? We have QQuickPaintedItem, for instance.
>
> > Also, Qt Widgets does not have as many fancy animations / tweening
> > everywhere by default that would make stuff slower.
> Qt Quick Controls have no animations by default except possibly native
> ones (in 1).
> > If we look at the other UI toolkits, WPF which is also
> > scene-graph-backed has a lot of cases where it fallbacks to software
> > for instance :
> Exactly - we don't need to get stuck with a framework as old as Widgets
> just because of a small number of corner cases.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20181210/298592cd/attachment.html>