[Interest] Chasing a standard

[Jérôme Godbout]

Qt is probably only used into a part of the Dashboard or entertainment system, the controller chip or embedded MCU and other safety controller are probably not using Qt nor C++.  They follow some MISRA, AUTOSAR, CERT standard. They have a C++ standard, but seriously it prevent a good chunk of the language usage. Like in the medical, it always on which system critical part your software going to run, the radio with BLE phone that crash is one thing, the wheel control is another matter. If you don't follow those standard (which is possible), the burden of the proof of reliability false on you and you have to prove how your software can NEVER be a life threat.


-----Original Message-----
From: roland at logikalsolutions.com <roland at logikalsolutions.com> 
Sent: November 5, 2018 11:30 AM
To: Jérôme Godbout <godboutj at amotus.ca>
Cc: Jason H <jhihn at gmx.com>; interest <interest at qt-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Interest] Chasing a standard


Quoting Jérôme Godbout <godboutj at amotus.ca>:

> JPL would be a good thing if you were to make a peacemaker for  
> example. It's more for embedded C software where dynamic alloc is  
> not allowed (just like car industries). If you plan on running C++  
> on a

Stupid question, but if dynamic memory allocation is not allowed in  
the automotive industry, how is it Ford is constantly looking for low  
wage Qt developers? More a curiosity than anything else. Those  
contracts pay less than 1/3 of my standard billing rate so the emails  
and phone calls about them land in the virtual bit bucket.
-- 
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630) 205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
http://lesedi.us