[Interest] Linux openssl 1.1.0 versus 1.0.X

[Thiago Macieira]

On Sunday, 16 September 2018 03:18:39 PDT Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> No, it is not possible to support both without a lot of work, and since the
> problem will go away soon, it is not worth it. Loading libssl.so.1.0 before
> trying libssl.so might work though, at least if any distros exist with both
> libraries.

QtNetwork already does that. It loads the libssl with the full soname that it 
was configured with. That is provided by the macro SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER found 
in the openssl/opensslv.h header.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center