[Interest] QML preprocessing
giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Mon Apr 29 12:13:17 CEST 2019
On 24/04/2019 21:23, Alexander Ivash wrote:
> Yeah, it could work in theory, but in practice there already a lot of
> places which would require such a modification. This solution just
> doesn't scale.
Any preprocessing solution will require modifications at all call sites
anyhow, wouldn't it?
Moreover, resulting binary will contain
> string 'console.debug('password: ',
> someFunctionWhichReturnsPasswordFromProtectedStorage());' (well, maybe
> not if qml compiler was enabled).
Why would this be a problem anyhow?
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Interest