[Interest] Q_NAMESPACE is not portable?

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Mon Aug 26 17:56:39 CEST 2019

On 26/08/2019 17:29, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Okay... that's both good and bad news... good that it's fixed, bad that
> it isn't available in a released version.
> BTW, what happened to the doc? Macros aren't class members...

I'm thinking it's still

> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-76822

> (Relatedly, any word on lifting the implied <QObject> dependency on
> several of these?)

I agree in principle at moving these macros elsewhere, didn't *you* push 
a patch that got stuck just because of documentation issues? :-)

Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20190826/96a692e2/attachment.bin>

More information about the Interest mailing list