[Interest] Q_NAMESPACE is not portable?

Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.floss at gmail.com
Mon Aug 26 18:45:04 CEST 2019

On 26/08/2019 11.56, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On 26/08/2019 17:29, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> BTW, what happened to the doc? Macros aren't class members...
> I'm thinking it's still https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-76822

Could be.

>> (Relatedly, any word on lifting the implied <QObject> dependency on
>> several of these?)
> I agree in principle at moving these macros elsewhere, didn't *you* push
> a patch that got stuck just because of documentation issues? :-)

Yes (https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/265168). I would
like to see it un-stuck :-).


More information about the Interest mailing list