[Interest] Fwd: vs. Flutter

René Hansen renehh at gmail.com
Thu Feb 21 14:53:05 CET 2019


You're reversing the burden of proof here. Where have Qt stated that it is
non-free for mobile?

The licensing terms are the same no matter the platform; Qt is LGPL or
Commercial. It's up to you to adhere to whichever license you choose to
utilise.


/René


On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 14:50 Sylvain Pointeau <sylvain.pointeau at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:30 PM Sylvain Pointeau <
> sylvain.pointeau at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Qt is free on desktop, but it is not free on mobile, which is a real
>> showstopper for me and many others.
>>
>> Le mar. 19 févr. 2019 à 20:12, ich <alex at golks.de> a écrit :
>>
>>> Qt is free, too.
>>>
>>
> I received few personal emails to ask me why am I writing that Qt is not
> free on mobile.
>
> I am sorry but this is the message from the Qt company, please show me one
> official statement that Qt is free to use on mobile.
> I would be really glad and finally use Qt instead of looking for
> alternatives.
>
> Best regards,
> Sylvain
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20190221/117828ae/attachment.html>


More information about the Interest mailing list