[Interest] Licensing

[alexander golks]

Am Wed, 9 Oct 2019 20:43:58 +0200
schrieb Uwe Rathmann <Uwe.Rathmann at tigertal.de>:

> Of course this information is useless for someone who wants to change 
> the license - the decision for the LGPL had been made long before. It is 
> about sending the message that you should not do LGPL, if you don't want 
> to be banned later.

well, i'm 100% behind you. but this is not useless. 
at least you know, that the qc may reject your request.
on the other side, they may not. depends.

for me, presonally, there are few reasons to go commercial.

the information on their qt.io website was ever misguiding, several years already, and seems to continue.
but i think due to the nature of the "company" (shame on you!).

so, in turn, i hope some guys on this list will get some some ideas about (l)gpl theory.

+2

-- 
/*
 *  Q:  Why haven't you graduated yet?
 *  A:  Well, Dad, I could have finished years ago, but I wanted
 *    my dissertation to rhyme.
 */
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20191009/b3f92488/attachment.sig>