[Interest] rebooted QtWebKit for Qt4??

[René J.V. Bertin]

On Thursday July 09 2020 14:21:53 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:

>I don't know how complex is said application, but almost certainly it would be easier to port it to Qt5 instead (and more useful to community, as Qt4 had reached EOL many years ago)

I know, but you know what they say about things that ain't broke ;)
One of the applications (rather, suite of...) is KDE PIM. I don't even want to try the current version of it, partly because it only supports QtWebEngine (if I wanted to read my mail using Chromium I could just as well use the real full-fledged browser I already have running ;) ).

I can also do that just with the email that doesn't render correctly ... or view that on my phone.

>2) using Qt4 in UI process and Qt5 in render process is not feasible as they share a lot of code

I don't see the problem here, as long as we're talking about actual individual processes?

FWIW, any Qt4/KDE4 application that uses KWallet functionality will talk with the Qt5-based KWallet daemon nowadays, through the KDE4 wallet client API. 

R.