[Interest] L Word
Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)
bstottle at ford.com
Fri Apr 30 14:01:05 CEST 2021
On 4/30/21, 7:06 AM, "Lars Knoll" <lars.knoll at qt.io> wrote:
If he decides to come back after that I do expect that his emails follow our CoC and stay on topic for this mailing list. Any further violations will lead to a permanent ban.
Thanks, Lars, both for the ban and the explanation. Sigh of relief from me.
On 4/30/21, 6:36 AM, "Interest on behalf of Bernhard Lindner" <interest-bounces at qt-project.org on behalf of private at bernhard-lindner.de> wrote:
Of course the underlying intentions must be constructive anyway - which should be
the main question when considering to ban someone.
Do you think Roland's main intentions are destructive?
What is important is _not_ the intention, but the effect on the community. And for me, Roland's "contributions" were destructive. Roland looks at Qt through a lens of embedded safety/regulatory equipment. I get that and do appreciate the perspective. But he speaks in absolutes.
QML == Awful
Qt == Unstable
New members to the list get the wrong impression when Roland's extreme opinions aren't pushed back on. You've hit a bad place when the choice is ignoring FUD vs. fighting a flame-war. People that force that choice don't deserve to be here.
More information about the Interest