[Interest] Mixing Commercial and Open Source license for different projects

James Maxwell maxwell130631 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 16 17:33:29 CET 2021


Yes, such a setup would be is possible for me.

Am Di., 16. März 2021 um 17:02 Uhr schrieb Giuseppe D'Angelo <
giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com>:

> Il 15/03/21 16:16, James Maxwell ha scritto:
> > Is there even a difference between the GPL creator and commercial
> > creator? I feared that once I have a license, whenever I use any
> > QtCreator it is commercially licensed.
> >
> > But using QtCreator is not actually my main concern. If I have a
> > commercial Qt license, can I still develop for projects which are going
> > to be released under LGPL where also other people don't have a Qt
> > license (of course assuming we only use LGPL Qt and nothing of the
> > commercial only parts).
>
> No matter what the eventual differences between commercial Creator /
> open source Creator are (if any); but would it be a problem for you to
> use commercial Qt / Qt Creator for the commercial customer, and open
> source Qt / Qt Creator for the open source code?
>
> (Not dealing with the practical aspects of having multiple Qt
> installations and what not. Again, I'm just asking if such a setup is
> not possible for some specific reasons.)
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
> KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
> Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
> KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20210316/2de35ac0/attachment.html>


More information about the Interest mailing list