[Interest] The willy-nilly deletion of convenience, , methods (was: Mixing Commercial and Open...)

[Roland Hughes]

On 3/22/21 4:03 PM, interest-request at qt-project.org wrote:
> has any framework crossed your way that implements CoW?

Honestly, I haven't dug that deep.

Been using CopperSpice on RedDiamond editor. Veered off to try porting 
Gede to CopperSpice so I could finally look at the new strings. Back on 
the editor now as I ran into the 16 minute QList thing.

https://www.logikalsolutions.com/wordpress/information-technology/qlist/

So far that is the only place I can notice any significant difference 
between Qt CoW and obeying C++ standards. It might not even be directly 
that. They may just have some abhorrent bug I stumbled into. The test 
cases are on the blog and I filled the issue.

I'm batting about 50/50 with filing issues and having them fixed. A much 
improved batting average.

When I get "done" with RedDiamond I will use my "free" time to look for 
"what's next" at least for myself and my clients. I secretly hope at 
least one of them will make a good decision about "what's next" before I 
have to dig through a lot of trash.

-- 
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog