[Interest] The willy-nilly deletion of convenience,, methods
Roland Hughes
roland at logikalsolutions.com
Tue Mar 23 16:50:20 CET 2021
On 3/23/2021 8:24 AM, interest-request at qt-project.org wrote:
> Having read this entire conversation I find it interesting that we as developers are complaining about features being deprecated and removed in Qt but yet where is the anger when C++ spec removes features?
>
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B20#Removed_features_and_deprecation
Don't know of anybody that actually used any of that. volatile was
"iffy" the day they added it to the language standard. The definition
seemed to change compiler to compiler. Good riddance.
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p2131r0.html#removed
Couldn't reach, but I only allow https anymore.
>
> http://www.cplusplus2017.info/removed-features-from-c17/
Ditto
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1319r0.html#removed
>
>
Ditto
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593
https://theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
https://infiniteexposure.net
https://lesedi.us
https://johnsmith-book.com
https://logikalblog.com
https://interestingauthors.com/blog
More information about the Interest
mailing list