[Interest] The willy-nilly deletion of convenience,, methods

Roland Hughes roland at logikalsolutions.com
Tue Mar 23 16:50:20 CET 2021


On 3/23/2021 8:24 AM, interest-request at qt-project.org wrote:
> Having read this entire conversation I find it interesting that we as developers are complaining about features being deprecated and removed in Qt but yet where is the anger when C++ spec removes features?
>
>   
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B20#Removed_features_and_deprecation
Don't know of anybody that actually used any of that. volatile was 
"iffy" the day they added it to the language standard. The definition 
seemed to change compiler to compiler. Good riddance.
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p2131r0.html#removed
Couldn't reach, but I only allow https anymore.
>
> http://www.cplusplus2017.info/removed-features-from-c17/
Ditto
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1319r0.html#removed
>
>   
Ditto

-- 
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593

https://theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
https://infiniteexposure.net
https://lesedi.us
https://johnsmith-book.com
https://logikalblog.com
https://interestingauthors.com/blog



More information about the Interest mailing list