[Interest] Official linuxdeployqt ?

[Roland Hughes]

Well,

It's certainly not "optimal" and I don't believe it should have a high 
priority. It will lead to many horrible hacks for people compiling 
32-bit on a 64-bit machine.

Roland

On 8/9/22 10:17, Alexander Dyagilev wrote:
> I think that an optimal solution (and a pretty fit for me) would be 
> for the linuxdeployqt to just deploy all the necessary files next to 
> the specified binary.
>
> It's up to a developer what to do next with all the files.
>
> Of course, linuxdeployqt can also support (optionally) any number of 
> various packages. But this should be optional and has a less priority 
> to implement.
>

-- 
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog