[Interest] Official linuxdeployqt ?
Roland Hughes
roland at logikalsolutions.com
Tue Aug 9 20:30:28 CEST 2022
Well,
It's certainly not "optimal" and I don't believe it should have a high
priority. It will lead to many horrible hacks for people compiling
32-bit on a 64-bit machine.
Roland
On 8/9/22 10:17, Alexander Dyagilev wrote:
> I think that an optimal solution (and a pretty fit for me) would be
> for the linuxdeployqt to just deploy all the necessary files next to
> the specified binary.
>
> It's up to a developer what to do next with all the files.
>
> Of course, linuxdeployqt can also support (optionally) any number of
> various packages. But this should be optional and has a less priority
> to implement.
>
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
More information about the Interest
mailing list