[Interest] Is there a good alternative to the QML Controls in Qt6 for native desktop integration purposes?

[coroberti]

Hi Mark,
The initial dev is slower when using Widgets,
but with less bugs and more robustness, it could be worth doing it,
and at the end of the day, it is even time-saving.

The Qt apps on the desktop platforms you mentioned look very native with
Widgets.

There are many tips and ready solutions for Widgets you can find on the web
to cut the time for the initial development.

Kind regards,
Robert Iakobashvili
............................


On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 5:44 PM Mark Gaiser <markg85 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm facing so many bugs in QML Controls in Qt6 (they used to be Controls
> V2 in the Qt 5.x days) that I don't want to use them at all anymore. They
> are bugged beyond repair and downright unusable for native desktop
> integration purposes.
>
> Is there another good open source component set out there that integrates
> with the desktop. Specifically with Windows but preferably also with Linux
> (kde and gnome) and Mac.
>
> Using QWidgets should not be an alternative as it slows down development a
> lot. But given the crap that QML Controls is makes me consider switching to
> QWidgets instead.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20220221/060a1a63/attachment.htm>