[Interest] what are the requirements for QMetaType::metaObjectForType(QMetaType::type("QQuickLayout*")) to work?

NIkolai Marchenko enmarantispam at gmail.com
Fri May 3 18:58:45 CEST 2024


>  That means you should simply verify that your assumption worked

That's what the test I am trying to fix is for in the first place, yes. But
like I said, it looks like I can just force the registration in place if
it's not done yet and then rely on it being available

On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 7:56 PM Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>
wrote:

> On Friday 3 May 2024 09:24:18 GMT-7 NIkolai Marchenko wrote:
> > I just need to understand how to properly set up test environment for it.
>
> You're relying on internal behaviour. That means you should simply verify
> that
> your assumption worked, before any release of yours with the specific Qt
> version that you're compiling with.
>
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>   Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20240503/01a60574/attachment.htm>


More information about the Interest mailing list