[Marketing] Qt CS program discussion.

[Quim Gil]

On 05/15/2012 10:53 AM, ext Sivan Green wrote:
> Michael, quick glance at the program now - where is the ad hoc bof
> time ? Also where can we push in a doc session that should span as many
> maintainers due to project wide changes ?

See http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki/Program

Now we have 3 tables, one for each day. It is visible how many slots are 
available to be scheduled ad-hoc.

The times have been modified interpreting the last proposal in the list, 
favoring a long lunch break for relax & discussion.

I decided to remove the Add-on modules we had pre-scheduled. We can 
_force_ the Essentials maintainers to be at the Qt CS (or nominate 
someone) to drive a session about their modules, but we can't really do 
the same for the Add-ons. If a maintainer or someone comes here with a 
strong case about an Add-on module we can pre-schedule it.

After receiving some feedback about the previous draft, I've decided to 
add two sessions on Day 1 morning, right after State of the Union:

- Vision, gaps, contributors. Let's look beyond 5.1. What is the vision? 
What areas need more attention and development to get there? Are these 
areas well resourced? If not, who can step in? Many focused discussions 
can spin-off from here.

- Roadmap: platforms supported. A key topic that we overlooked in our 
San Francisco morning. Must be there, and it's connected to the other 2 
sessions that morning.


The game follows:

- Is there any session we MUST pre-schedule? Please provide reasons and 
specify who would drive it.

- Some sessions are pre-scheduled at the same time. Any conflicts per 
can prevent?

- The sessions in Galerie must be special: they happen in a huge room 
and they are video recorded for posterity. If this is too big for a 
topic currently scheduled we'd better move it to a smaller room, without 
video recording.

--
Quim