[PySide] About the next PySide release

[Hugo Parente Lima]

On Thursday 08 March 2012 14:24:29 anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:08 PM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Hugo Parente Lima
> > 
> > <hugo.lima at openbossa.org> wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 07 March 2012 05:20:18 anatoly techtonik wrote:
> >>> Hello guys,
> >>> 
> >>> Are there any prospects on possible release date?
> >> 
> >> We need to backport everything on github to the code on gerrit, when
> >> this finish we can finally release a new version.
> > 
> > 1. [ ] find the last common ancestor
> > With HG I would do:
> >  hg clone git://gitorious.org/pyside/pyside.git
> >  cd pyside
> >  hg inc --template '{node}' -l 1 git://github.com/PySide/PySide.git
> > 
> > 2. [ ] Make new clone and import revisions starting after the hash
> > from the step above into Mercurial Queue
> >  cd ..
> >  hg clone git://github.com/PySide/PySide.git pyside2
> >  cd pyside2
> >  hg qimport -r HASH:HEAD
> >  hg qpop -a
> >  cp -r .hg/patches ../pyside/.hg/
> >  cd ../pyside
> >  hg qpush -a
> >  hg qfinish -a
> > 
> > 
> > Unfortunately, after Matti flattened the repository history this won't
> > work anymore and we need to find this common revision manually. On the
> > second thought even if the history was there, the hashes would be
> > reindexed after history edition anyway, so we still have to inspect it
> > manually. In any case, I think that a bad move to kill the project
> > history.
> 
> It appears that neither me, nor Matti knows how to properly strip
> those offending revisions from the Git history. Rebasing doesn't work,
> because subsequent merges screw up everything. So, unless somebody
> possess required know how, I am afraid we will have to stick with the
> way things currently are.
> --
> anatoly t.

Second step done!

I rebased PySide removing the two offending commits and pushed the tree to the 
"clafix" branch of my PySide clone on github 
(https://github.com/hugopl/PySide)

The offending commits were:

- 0d60daf1e1a6edd95b58c7bdd33da8f4c1629c90
- 32681f7b7039f41bec4c4965370d4b66bee53532

By what I saw GeneratorRunner doesn't had any problems with missing CLA 
agreement, then the only missing repository is ApiExtractor.

Matti, do you still have the git hash annotated somewhere?

-- 
Hugo Parente Lima
INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/pyside/attachments/20120308/2af0f321/attachment.sig>