[PySide] PySide website down

[Matti Airas]

If we can get easy access to static web area hosted by Qt Project
Foundation, I think that would be much preferable solution.

I'm thinking of having a link to PySide documentation at
http://qt-project.org/doc/. :-)

ma.

On 28 September 2012 16:46, Srini Kommoori <vasure at gmail.com> wrote:

> pyside.org redirect to wiki page is online. I have updated wiki with a
> docs link.
>
> Hugo, Is it possible to host static documentation pages on github
> pyside account? I will send a pull request.
>
> thanks,
> -Srini
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Srini Kommoori <vasure at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 1. I contacted local Digia folks(Tuukka Ahoniemi) and they sent our
> > domain and vpc requests to concerned folks. Hope we will hear
> > something back from them today.
> >
> > On the technical side of things, I just checked search also on the
> > docs, there is no dependency on a server as they are all static pages
> > and javascript is doing the search.
> > http://srinikom.github.com/pyside-docs/
> >
> > So we could host docs on github without depending on anyone. All we
> > need is domain whois info access Or someone willing to modify domain
> > settings for us.
> >
> > 2. I can easily create a blogger site+blog with the same theme and we
> > all can collaborate and publish updates.
> >
> > 3. I volunteer to take up the hosting tasks going forward completely.
> > It would be good to know how is the project structured? Who posts
> > binaries? I think on the coding and checkin side, our git repository
> > is taken care right now - do we need any help on that?
> >
> > Matti, Am I missing any hosting tasks?
> >
> > thanks,
> > -Srini
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Matti Airas <mairas at iki.fi> wrote:
> >> Hi Stephan,
> >>
> >> On 28 September 2012 15:07, Stephan Deibel <sdeibel at wingware.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Matti Airas wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I'm almost 100% certain that the PSF hosting some resources for PySide
> >>> won't come with a requirement about licensing or process for PySide.
>  Or at
> >>> least that's my impression from having been on the PSF board some
> years ago,
> >>> and from everything I've observed since. It certainly is true that a
> >>> contributor agreement is needed for anything in Python itself and the
> Python
> >>> standard library, but PySide would not go into the Python standard
> library.
> >>
> >>
> >> I was discussing the issue with some PSF board members back in August
> 2011,
> >> and that was the message then.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> That said, is the problem with Qt Project or a temporary one caused by
> the
> >>> transfer from Nokia to Digia?
> >>
> >>
> >> It's probably really neither. I think the problem was more due to the
> >> overworked Nokia Qt organization having to deliver to an unpublished
> closed
> >> project, while at the same time having to cater for the open Qt
> Project. The
> >> open project probably couldn't be sufficiently prioritized - it wasn't
> an
> >> issue with Qt Project itself, IMHO. Ever an optimist, I actually think
> Digia
> >> has more interest in Qt Project in general and in PySide too.
> >>
> >> I got a while ago in contact with Lars Knoll (Qt lead maintainer), and
> he
> >> wanted to resolve the issue ASAP. Also talked to Tuukka Turunen (Digia
> Qt
> >> Commercial Director), and he wanted to resolve the issue without delay,
> too.
> >> So, let's hope for the best.
> >>
> >>> I don't care too much either way but maybe in the long term being part
> of
> >>> the Qt Project will be less hassle (if really part of it, and not
> easily
> >>> orphaned again as seems to have happened now).
> >>
> >>
> >> Me too, with the same condition. :-)
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> ma.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/pyside/attachments/20120928/8cfff601/attachment.html>