[QBS] Increasing verbosity of targetOS-based on conditions in user code
Oswald Buddenhagen
oswald.buddenhagen at digia.com
Thu Jun 13 12:03:04 CEST 2013
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:37:59AM +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 10:02 AM, Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> > Is it really worth it, given that we want extend Array to have a
> > contains method anyway, which would make the code less verbose again?
>
> I find
> condition: qbs.targetOS.contains("windows") ||
> qbs.targetOS.contains("darwin")
>
> much more readable than a "filter" property.
>
this is certainly the language-wise more minimalistic approach.
however, one should consider that the filter-based approach is purely
declarative, which facilitates tooling (as opposed to the functional
code above).
> Do you plan to allow the contains() method to receive a list of
> parameters in order to make the above even shorter, or would it be
> possible to write something like:
>
> condition: qbs.targetOS in ["windows", "darwin"]
>
targetOS will be a list once jake's changes are in. the semantics of
'in' on a list are blurry at best. the dedicated filter syntax seems
less confusing to me.
More information about the Qbs
mailing list