[QBS] What is the suggested way to do deeply nested projects?
jake.petroules at petroules.com
Tue Aug 12 08:11:05 CEST 2014
On 2014-08-12, at 02:05 AM, Thomas Epting <thomas.epting.stryker at gmail.com> wrote:
> > We simply don't support dots in target names. I don't think this
> > is a serious limitation.
> There *are* structured DLL names out there, like "vendor.component.subcomponent.dll" in several commercial libraries. Even some of the DLLs created in our company use several dots (but for other reasons). And maybe there are even more valid use cases. So I think there should be no such limitation for target names in a build system. Just my 2 cents.
Yeah. Also, the entire .NET framework and many third party .NET assemblies as well. So this limitation won't fly long term; let's find a different way to solve this problem. How about using \0 as a separator? :)
> QBS mailing list
> QBS at qt-project.org
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com
Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation
More information about the Qbs