[Qbs] Depends Issue

Christian Kandeler Christian.Kandeler at qt.io
Sat Sep 9 18:18:50 CEST 2017


Can you please file a bug report?
________________________________________
From: Epting, Thomas <thomas.epting at stryker.com>
Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 8:07 AM
To: Christian Kandeler; qbs at qt-project.org
Subject: AW: [Qbs] Depends Issue

> Arguably, we should set this value again in setup-toolchains.

Sounds good, as the new behavior is creating problems on our side, too.

Thomas

-----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Qbs [mailto:qbs-bounces+thomas.epting=stryker.com at qt-project.org] Im Auftrag von Christian Kandeler
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. September 2017 01:48
An: qbs at qt-project.org
Betreff: Re: [Qbs] Depends Issue

You did not specify what went wrong four you. I assume you are referring to the fact that the condition of the Depends item evaluates to false. This is because the value of qbs.architecture comes from a Probe, which is not evaluated until later. Workaround: Set qbs.architecture in your profile. Arguably, we should set this value again in setup-toolchains.


Christian

________________________________________
From: Qbs <qbs-bounces+christian.kandeler=qt.io at qt-project.org> on behalf of Dorian Jicquel <dorian.jicquel at mana-sys.fr>
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 2:17 PM
To: qbs at qt-project.org
Subject: [Qbs] Depends Issue

Hi,


Since 1.9.0, it is not possible anymore to have two Depends with the same name in the same product, for example :

Depends { name: "Qt" ; submodules:["core"] } Depends { name: "Qt" ; condition: qbs.architecture=="x86"; submodules:["gui","widgets"] }



Any clue about this ? Thanks in advance,


Regards,


Dorian.

_______________________________________________
Qbs mailing list
Qbs at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qbs
_______________________________________________
Qbs mailing list
Qbs at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qbs



More information about the Qbs mailing list