[Qbs] Future of Qbs

[NIkolai Marchenko]

Not saying you should build Qt with it, I do  see the point Thiago makes,
but it looks like qbs is becoming a major point of even going Qt if we go
by ppl's comments.

Feels like you could extend support and see if it's feasible to switch to
it a few years later.


On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:41 PM NIkolai Marchenko <enmarantispam at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thiago, Lars: can we please have another blog post asking for people to
> voice their opinion on the matter?
> it does seem like you are underestimting how much traction qbs has.
> People in the comment section are saying they are porting their projects
> to qbs left and right.
> This is very far from "failed to gain traction"
> More like: "finally gaining momentum"
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:35 PM Kari Oikarinen <kari.oikarinen at qt.io>
> wrote:
>
>> On 31.10.2018 15:26, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
>> <snip>
>> > PS: completely off-topic, has qt.io (aka the Qt Company) ever heard of
>> > https everywhere [1]?
>> > The Qt mailing list archive is currently serving plain HTTP over HTTPS
>> > port [2]. And is redirecting http to https...
>> >
>> > [1] https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere
>> > [2] http://lists.qt-project.org/
>>
>> It's a new problem that popped up recently and IT should be onto fixing
>> it now.
>>
>> --
>> Kari
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qbs mailing list
>> Qbs at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qbs
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qbs/attachments/20181031/fa2c789a/attachment.html>