[Qt-creator] Qt Creator and CMake

hatred adrozdoff at gmail.com
Wed Mar 28 01:47:27 CEST 2012


Kostya, Hi!

Could you please provide sources for test?

28 марта 2012 г. 7:03 пользователь Konstantin Tokarev
<annulen at yandex.ru> написал:
>
>
> 13.02.2012, 16:13, "Daniel Teske" <daniel.teske at nokia.com>:
>> On Monday 13 Feb 2012 11:21:55 ext Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi Qt Creator developers,
>>>
>>>  From organizational point of view, if one contributes to Qt Creator
>>>  alternative version of CMake build system plugin with better integration
>>>  quality but at a price of static linking to CMakeLib (increasing binary size
>>>  on ~7 Mb), will it have a chance to be accepted into mainline?
>>
>> Well, I'd like to have qt creator not depend on having the cmake sources
>> available. That's not unsolveable.
>>
>> If those 7 MB are for a release build, then yes that would be a problem, as
>> that is more then double the size of the biggest plugin now.
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I have working CMakeLib-based fork of CMakeProjectManager. Total size of
> plugin with statically linked CMakeLib is 3.5 M (on Linux).
>
> It runs CMake's configure function in a background thread with nice progress bar
> (like with QMake) and provides some other benefits as compared with original
> plugin:
> * Defines
> * No intermediate Code::Blocks project is generated
> * Direct access to cache variables through CMake API instead of manual cache file
> parsing in old plugin
> * CMake re-parsing runs in background thread (with progress bar) and
> doesn't block GUI
> * (planned) cmake-gui style cache variable configuration on project settings page
>
>
> So, what can you propose to overcome dependency on CMake sources?
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Konstantin
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-creator mailing list
> Qt-creator at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator



More information about the Qt-creator mailing list