[Qt-creator] Problems using c++11 features
orgads at gmail.com
Thu Apr 4 07:43:48 CEST 2013
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Orgad Shaneh <orgads at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Leandro T. C. Melo <ltcmelo at gmail.com>wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Orgad Shaneh <orgads at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ... (and almost any other code-model problems, at least the ones I
>>> tend to be ignored (i.e. not even evaluated).
>> Hi Orgad,
>> perhaps that's not a quite fair statement. Try applying this same filter
>> but with the resolution set to *Done* instead of *Unresolved*:
>> Just in certain defense (although I'm not actively contributing), the
>> term *ignore* would not be appropriate, given that for many issues there's
>> an honest concern to fix them. However, it's not always simple and more
>> "significant" changes might also be going on.
>> Of course, further work is still necessary with templates, but I
>> personally think there have already been nice improvements...
> Thanks for your reply.
> I thought I might sound a bit offensive, but it's quite frustrating that I
> take the time to report bugs, and it doesn't look like anybody notices them
> at all.
> I'd even appreciate it if anyone would just evaluate them and prioritize
> (most of) them as "Somewhat important" or even "Low", but I don't get the
> impression that they're even looked at!
> Take a look yourself at the link you provided, the last bug I see there
> that was fixed by non-volunteers is QTCREATORBUG-8050, which was closed in
> November. All the bugs after this were fixed by Przemyslaw. Some of them
> are really important, and bug many users, not just me.
> I do understand there are more important issues, but I'd be happy for a
> bit more attention.
> - Orgad
I just want to clarify that I deeply appreciate all the work done by Erik,
Nikolai (and previously Leandro and Christian Kamm). You're really doing a
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Qt-creator