[Qt-creator] Submitting a plugin that does not follow the coding style

[Carel Combrink]

Dear Oswald,

Regarding this issue, is there a quick way to do a "dry run" on a plugin to
see how much a plugin conforms (or does not conform) to the coding style?

Regards,

-- Check out my SpellChecker Plugin for Qt Creator @
https://github.com/CJCombrink/SpellChecker-Plugin


On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <
oswald.buddenhagen at theqtcompany.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 05:40:36PM +0200, Jochen Becher wrote:
> > (1) A static library that implements the "modelling backend" (entities,
> > persistence, diagrams, UI components)
> >
> > (2) A plugin that links the modelling backend with QtCreator (mostly a
> > new editor for diagrams)
> >
> > (3) A tool to export diagrams to image files
> >
> > (4) A patch of projectexplorer supporting more drag&drop
> >
>
> > I can update (2) and (3) following the coding style guide ((4) already
> > does).
> >
> yes, please.
>
> > But (1) is pretty large and I want to avoid all those changes. Is that
> > acceptable if I submit the library in src/libs/3rdparty?
> >
> size as such isn't an argument (the process can be mostly automated).
> but if you are indeed maintaining that library independently of
> qtcreator's existence, then it's by definition 3rdparty.
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-creator mailing list
> Qt-creator at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-creator/attachments/20150601/b4c4bb83/attachment.html>