[Qt-creator] GSoC 2018: New feature proposal for Qt Creator

Orgad Shaneh orgads at gmail.com
Mon Mar 12 13:46:27 CET 2018


On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Sree Gowtham Josyula <
sreegowthamj at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi André & Everyone,
>
> Thanks for showing interest in my suggestion. QTCREATORBUG-16246 is
> indeed almost like what I had intended in my previous mail.
>
> > * Would it be enough to have the files on a network share instead of
> rsync'ing them?
> > * Is it really needed to have Clang running on the remote machine? Would
> it be enough to have access to the included headers on remote?
>
> I think Network share you suggest is a good idea. It solves both of
> the above issues. With network sharing, we wouldn't need rsync and we
> wouldn't need to run clang on remote machine.
>
> I will refine my initial proposal and put forth a more detailed
> proposal considering your suggestions and more use-cases asap.
> If you have any other thoughts and suggestions, kindly let me know.
>

Hi,

I strongly suggest *not* to use network share. We tried that several years
ago (with SMB), and it was awful. Parsing takes forever over the network.
Working locally and using rsync before build works much better (once you
have ssh keys set up).

We have a local partial copy of the sysroot, which includes the include
directory, and the shared libraries that are linked with our application
(for each platform we support).

- Orgad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-creator/attachments/20180312/e00f7f25/attachment.html>


More information about the Qt-creator mailing list